Could the Internet be being used to systematically disadvantage consumers+
1 Comment Published by yorick.wilks October 17th, 2007 in *OIINEWSWe all assume, and have experiences to show, that internet purchasing is transparent and efficient and works to the benefit of everyone, except perhaps small bookshops and their equivalents everywhere: I will never now give up the speed and efficiency of Amazon.com for a bookshop. But a couple of very recent experiences have caused me to wonder whether there are not loopholes being exploited by corporations within the Internet market to trap consumers and prevent them making better choices. I am not suggesting any fraud or systematic conspiracy against the consumer, only that these experiences, with a very large American Airline have shown me the possibility of this, and I am exploring how widespread the practice is that I encountered this week in buying airline tickets. If it is widespread, the need for publicity or even consumer legislation is obvious.
The facts are these: on the main website of a large American Airline I purchased a ticket for £206 for my son to fly in two months from New York to Nevada. I entered the details of my American Express credit card, as I have in the course of many similar purchases. A screen came back saying “Ticket purchased” plus small print to say my electronic ticket and confirmation would follow shortly. On most previous occasions that had come by email within minutes from the company’s computers. Three days later it has not come, and I grew anxious and phoned the airline, because I know the online market is moving at great speed as Christmas approaches and, if I lose this ticket for any reason, I might get a worse bargain. I also know I might do better, as I had seen the same route available for £50 less with US Airways. But I am not very anxious, because I have been a loyal multimillion-mile customer with the large American Airline for 20 years and never had any problem of this sort.
My anxiety increased slightly on phoning because I was told a blatant lie: that the delay in ticketing is because I have a foreign-billed credit card and these must be checked by hand; I am in a queue and the ticket will follow in “ a coupe of days”. This rings all kinds of alarm bells because ticketing is normally instantaneous. It is made clear to me when I ask, and this is approaching the nub of this blog, that although the ticket is PURCHASED it is not TICKETED, and no I cannot cancel the whole transaction. The credit card checking excuse is absurd, because the same card for the same son had been instantly accepted by other US airline websites in the same week, and had I called and made this booking on the phone (for $10 surcharge!) my card would have been accepted instantly. The card-and-manual queue argument is a transparent falsehood.
None of this might matter were it not for another and quite separate experience with the same airline a day earlier, booking a flight for 5 people in the same December period. In that case, I again got the “Ticket Purchased” web page back and thought no more about it. But on returning to check the timings I realised the confirmation and E-ticket had again not come but on phoning I was informed my purchase had been cancelled. It had been cancelled, I was told in rough tones, because I had made two reservations for the same group to two different cities in the US in that period, in Nevada and Texas. I said, as one would, yes but so what: they were both 24 hour options that would automatically expire at no harm to the airline. This is normal practice by consumers; but I had actually purchased one of the reservations with my credit card. Why, I wailed, had they cancelled the one I had purchased and not the other one where I did nothing to follow it up.
I was told that when the computer detected double booking it cancelled all but one reservation “at random”. Now, it cannot be the case that a multi-billion airline is unable to write software for the Internet to cancel an unpurchased reservation in preference to a purchased one. Yet my own naivety and company loyalty sent me back again at this point to the web to buy a new ticket for each of the 5 at £100 more a head. The glitch and the cancellation had just given the American Airline £500 more for absolutely no benefit to me.
It was this earlier experience that has fully roused my suspicions in the case of the second ticket, for the son and still unresolved, that something systematic might be happening here and, whatever it is, fraud or something else, it is unlikely to be mere incompetence on the part of the airline. Consider the issue in market terms: I as a consumer have been trapped now for three days, unable to cancel my “purchased ticket” and buy elsewhere. The American Airline, as I saw with the earlier group of 5 tickets, can cancel that purchase at any time and not even tell me, which could have allowed the group to turn up at an airport at Christmas believing they had Electronic tickets while actually having nothing! By luck I spotted that one in time. This imbalance of power is extraordinary: a consumer trapped and unable to shift options for an indefinite period and a company that may or may not honour the purchase, when it chooses. Its computers could clearly be seeking to sell that same seat to a higher bidder—if that were the case everything we have been taught to believe about internet purchases of such tickets is unreliable. Certainly in the case of the 5 tickets, the Airline reneged on its “tickets purchased” claim and sold them back to me, in effect, for £500 more because I was nervous, loyal ands acting semi-irrationally for fear of having family with no travel at Christmas,
If these practices are being driven by design rather than incompetence the Internet ticket market for major airlines is a far worse bargain for consumers than has generally been thought—and much much better for the airlines—-and the option of buying by phone for $10 more is the best bargain of all.
Search
About
Yorick Wilks is a Senior Research Fellow at the OII, and a Professor of Artificial Intelligence at the University of Sheffield. He received his M. A. and Ph.D. (1968) from Pembroke College, Cambridge. He has also taught or researched at Stanford, Edinburgh, Geneva, Essex and New Mexico State Universities. His interests are artificial intelligence and the computer processing of language, knowledge and belief, and in particular the notion of conversational Companion agents as a new type of interface to the Internet. His recent books include: Artificial Believers (Erlbaum 1991), Electric Words (MIT, 1996) and Machine Conversations (Kluwer, 2001), Machine Translation: its scope and limits (Springer, 2008), and Close Encounters with Artificial Companions (John Benjamins, 2010). He is a Fellow of the European and American Societies for Artificial Intelligence, a Fellow of of the EPSRC College of Computing, a member of the UK Computing Research Council, and a Fellow of the ACM. He won the Zampolli Prize in 2008, and the British Computer Society’s Lovelace Medal in 2009.

That is scary. As a thought experiment, I wonder if one were to pull the whole scenario entirely into the UK and assume that all the law including all the consumer regulation law applied, what claim could you make? For a start it would be hard to prove. I always save the whole web page of any receipt or page saying I have bought something or booked it for this reason. I have never had to use it.
I do believe strongly that the Internet is used to flummox people. For example do you remember a few years ago that a few online sellers got their fingers burned when they sold many items at super low prices that they could not then supply but then found they had legally accepted the order, and had to. SInce then canny online sellers have the weird condition that the order is not accepted until it is supplied. This is a disadvantage to the consumer if it is even strictly legal. John Lewis is an example, and while they are a superb firm who probably only uses it to cover real mistakes, others may not be so scrupulous and may sell items sold to others for a higher price.
A side problem here is that in real life we are constantly checking, without even noticing it, sanity. If I was in a supermarket and accidentally picked up a litre bottle of tomato ketchup my arm would be the first to tell me that this would not be good for the camping trip I was planning. I have actually made this mistake with Tesco online, ending up with a giant bottle of Ketchup. The internet did not tell my arm how heavy it was, and yes I should have read the listing carefully, and mostly I do.
This leads me slightly away from the Internet to those 2 for one, 3 for 2, buy 2 get 70p off, buy 3 for £x offers at supermarkets. I am convinced there is a big untold secret here. This is a technologically enabled offer, hard to do manually. I have no doubt the supermarkets make amargin out of confusion about the validity of these offers. That people fail to complete them metriculously and lose out. I recently bought two mangos and the 2 for one offer failed (I check them!) so I asked why, the answer is I bought two mangos but one was organic. An offer applied to both organic and non-organic, but not a mix.
As an aside, I note that on the Internet Tesco make you manually complete these offers “add 2 for offer” it says for atwo for one offer, when the software could easily do this for you, or warn of dangling, incomplete offers later on. Another thing the online service does not do is present only those special offers that apply on the date of delivery, even though the system knows, and tells you, the validity dates.
From the point of view of regulation, I think supermarkets should by law have to show all dangling offers at the till, with a chance to complete them. The shelf tickets should also show what products (including flavours) are within the multibuy offer.
The phenomenon of shielding, where people act several degrees worse than they would if face to face (or person to person on the telephone) means that stories can be spun without becoming red faced. There is a whole field of socio-psychology here to be explored and I couldn’t even begin to go into here. Software systems are complex, and often shrouded in a mystery (propogated by programmers for a start, and by users at the end) of almost occult proportions. The ancient excuse “Oh it’s the computer” still applies, and did apply to your situation. What passes for the truth is all that matters to the person on the phone, the fact that you know more about how a software system works than they do cuts no ice.
So in summary, there is complexity of the system, a suspension of common sense when computers arrive, also laziness in thinking, and shielding, together with problems of International regulation.
If a market trader sells mangos and says 2 for £1 and you buy an organic and a non-organic, and he says “sorry mate only two of the same kind” you would laugh in his face.
If I were dealing with a two faced ticket seller like the one you mention, I would not use them again. Or would I? I have been conned by Paypal on a couple of occasions, but I still use them for small purchases. In the end my Credit card company stands up to them, but that’s another story.
Regards
Nick Hegenbarth