<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Han-teng Liao 廖漢騰 &#187; theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/category/theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng</link>
	<description>@ OII 牛津網際網路研究所 / 牛津互联网研究所</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are traders really traitors? Respecting and reconciling the roles of traders and guardians.</title>
		<link>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2011/08/26/are-traders-really-traitors-respecting-and-reconciling-the-roles-of-traders-and-guardians/</link>
		<comments>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2011/08/26/are-traders-really-traitors-respecting-and-reconciling-the-roles-of-traders-and-guardians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Han-Teng Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[*OIINEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese-written Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security and prosperity are sometimes conflicting goals ...  Loyalty ... is demanded for a sense of security.  However, exchange with other information systems, cities and nation-states is also required for prosperity and growth.  Traders can be considered as traitors.  This is the essay where I connect three works in a way to provide one consistent framework to look at both the Chinese and American online political discussion environment.  <a href="http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2011/08/26/are-traders-really-traitors-respecting-and-reconciling-the-roles-of-traders-and-guardians/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2011/08/26/are-traders-really-traitors-respecting-and-reconciling-the-roles-of-traders-and-guardians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re-enchantment and Rationalization in Internet</title>
		<link>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2009/03/01/re-enchantment-and-rationalization-in-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2009/03/01/re-enchantment-and-rationalization-in-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Han-Teng Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[*OIINEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enchantment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much as I appreciate and support the pragmatic approach of &#8220;digital-era governance&#8221; (DEG), I still find something still missing there about the Internet.  I have found it lately.  It is the re-enchantment part of the Internet, that is to say, &#8230; <a href="http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2009/03/01/re-enchantment-and-rationalization-in-internet/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2009/03/01/re-enchantment-and-rationalization-in-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exposing &#8220;Special Speech Zones&#8221; (SSZs)</title>
		<link>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2008/12/07/exposing-special-speech-zones-sszs/</link>
		<comments>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2008/12/07/exposing-special-speech-zones-sszs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 01:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Han-Teng Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[*OIINEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese-written Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GFW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2008/12/07/exposing-special-speech-zones-sszs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rebecca MacKinnon&#8217;s empirical research on Chinese Blog Service Providers&#8217; censorship pattern is arguably the first systematic attempt to map what I call &#8220;special speech zones&#8221;(SSZs). By special speech zones I mean areas (virtual or physical) set aside by authorities or &#8230; <a href="http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2008/12/07/exposing-special-speech-zones-sszs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2008/12/07/exposing-special-speech-zones-sszs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>公地悲劇的迷思: A Chinese Translation of &#8220;The Myth of the Tragedy of the Commons&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2008/11/12/%e5%85%ac%e5%9c%b0%e6%82%b2%e5%8a%87%e7%9a%84%e8%bf%b7%e6%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2008/11/12/%e5%85%ac%e5%9c%b0%e6%82%b2%e5%8a%87%e7%9a%84%e8%bf%b7%e6%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Han-Teng Liao</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[*OIINEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2008/11/12/%e5%85%ac%e5%9c%b0%e6%82%b2%e5%8a%87%e7%9a%84%e8%bf%b7%e6%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[公地悲劇的迷思 A Chinese Translation of &#8220;The Myth of the Tragedy of the Commons&#8221; 原文: http://www.monthlyreview.org/mrzine/angus250808.html 採用社羣所有制的土地、森林和漁業是走向的生態災難的不歸路？August 25, 2008 2008年8月25日 作者：伊恩安格斯　（Ian Angus） ( Originally published in , August 24, 2008) （最初發表於《社會主義之聲》Socialist Voice ，八月二十四日， 2008年） 共享資源總是被濫用及誤用？ 採用社羣所有制的土地、森林和漁業是走向的生態災難的不歸路？私有化是保護環境和結束第三世界貧困的的唯一途徑？多數經濟學家和發展規劃者會回答「是的」 ，而要求進一步說明的話，他們會引用在此議題上最具影響力的一篇文章。 此小論文刊在1968年12月的《科學》期刊上，〈公地悲劇〉（The Tragedy of the &#8230; <a href="http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2008/11/12/%e5%85%ac%e5%9c%b0%e6%82%b2%e5%8a%87%e7%9a%84%e8%bf%b7%e6%80%9d/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://people.oii.ox.ac.uk/hanteng/2008/11/12/%e5%85%ac%e5%9c%b0%e6%82%b2%e5%8a%87%e7%9a%84%e8%bf%b7%e6%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

