There are existing and ongoing research projects related to national web studies, including “Mapping Iran Online” and “Big UK Domain Data“. So how do we delineate and define Chinese Web? Please help provide your views in this online survey. Continue reading
In a nutshell, as democratic and civic practices have the potentials to spread across cultural-political boundaries online, authoritarian techniques and practices can be spread as well. Both methods and theories must be developed to, not only explain the often softer kind of authoritarian techniques (including “guiding public opinion”, see “Guidance of Public Opinion 舆论导向” and “State Media and Public Opinion on the HK Protests”), but also begin to contextualize the Chinese-language Internet (involving Hong Kong, Taiwan and overseas Chinese users) in their centripetal vs centrifugal relationship towards Beijing. After all, one of the major (but untested) assumption underlying the necessity for a party-state for China is that, it would be impossible to maintain an orderly, stable and unified country without Beijing and its current authoritarian techniques and practices.
My DPhil (PhD) thesis contains the following chapters, some of which can be downloaded at the Social Science Research Network (SSRN):
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Chapter 2 Literature review
- Chapter 3 Theoretical framework and methods used
- Chapter 4 Editorial processes, Internet control, and Internet diffusion
- Chapter 5 Citation and content analysis
- Chapter 6 Reception and use
- Chapter 7 Conclusion
If you are interested in reading the substantial chapters (Chapter 4, Chapter 5, and Chapter 6), please contact me. Also, two additional files contain the remaining parts of the thesis:
After successfully defending my PhD/DPhil and submitting revisions, I am “on the market” for academic or corporate opportunities that have substantial research components. Meanwhile, I will be finishing some publication work (including DPhil thesis and new/old collaboration work) within two or three months and continuing some academic duties using my spare time including this one for the special issue of Policy and Internet.
In response to the “Uneven Geographies of User-Generated Information“, I argue that researchers and analysts must be explicit and transparent about the parameters of ideal “eveness”. Ideal evenness could be as simple as a sense of proportionality to the number of speakers, the number of Internet users, or the number of offline publications. Such sense of “evenness” provides essential and concrete baselines for online/offline, cross-country, and/or cross-language comparison. In a poster for the upcoming Opensym 2014, my coauthor and I propose one such possibility of using the number of language speakers across different countries (e.g. Arabic speaking population in Egypt, Israel, Kuwait, etc.) to showcase how the viewing and editing traffic is unevenly distributed.
In a nutshell, it is not surprising that Egypt and Saudi Arabia as major contributing country for reading and editing Arabic Wikipedia, but it is interesting to see, *per capita*(as defined here as per the number of Arabic language speakers for each region), smaller and yet more Internet-ready countries such as Israel, Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Jordan, etc., contribute significantly more.
It is particularly interesting that Israel contribute the most *per-capita* viewing traffic to Arabic Wikipedia. The pilot findings however relies on the accuracy of the data on the number of speakers listed in “Language-Territory Information” compiled by the Unicode Consortium in CLDR version 25. Regardless, the proposed *per capita* metrics opens the doors not only for better and more detailed understanding of the “unevenness” of analytics of user-generated content, but also for more tangible baselines for our assumptions of “evenness”.