Mainstream news, blogs and what is democracy
2 Comments Published by Alejandro February 7th, 2008 in *OIINEWS, PoliticsWhen you read the title, you may wonder what is the link between these three things. Yesterday, Tobias Escher, a colleague of mine here at the OII gave us a taste of some research he is doing in his “free time” (if there is such a thing in a DPHil, or rather if there is anything that can be called “busy time” d
). Through his research he wants to find a relation between traditional media and blogs in agenda-setting. He is doing it by comparing which stories both media follow, though an elaborate system based on keywords, databases and google/yahoo services. I must say that I still have to understand the relation between reporting a story and setting the agenda, for the latter is, I reckon, more related with presence or importance of the medium than with frequency of the stories. In any case, I found it very inspiring and interesting, I hope he finds the time to complete the research!
So now you may ask what about “democracy”? This morning I was reading the editorial of the Herald Tribune, it is about how bad for democracy is the division within in the parties shown during the Supertuesday; for the editor the animosity or confrontation between supporters of each candidate “is not the way democracy is supposed to work”, on the contrary party unity that will bring a more united America is “how democracy is supposed to work”. I don’t agree at all with this perspective, healthy political and democratic confrontation is a good think, especially in a system with not so much plurality as American politics!
So note that I am reporting from a mainstream media and blogging, so I am among those being set by the traditional media, in my case the relation is clear, I don’t know about the others though…. In any case, Tobias here you have a story, a blog, a traditional media and a bunch of keywords for your database! ![]()
Search
About
Alejandro Ribo-Labastida, DPhil student, Oxford Internet Institute

The electoral registers for Sunderland North contain incorrect
voter registration numbers printed in the columns alongside voters
names. Sometimes the Registers are printed with the same error
numbers year after year, one particular period from 1958 to 1961
shows that these numbers cannot be common human error as during
this period one housing estate was covered by two separate electoral
wards and both of these wards show the same printed error numbers
for this one housing estate. All of the electoral registers that I
have looked at dating from about 1950 to 1972 contain errors,
the placed error numbers probably continue up to the early 1990′s.
it’s good